The President Makes A Whistle Stop In My Olde Home Towne....

President Obama will be embarking on a bus tour of Central New York, making a stop in Syracuse on Thursday August 22nd, 2013.

He's going to give a to give a little talk concerning educational opportunities at Henniger High School. According to the White House, he will presumably discuss and promote the "importance of ensuring that every American has the opportunity to achieve a quality education by reducing cost and improving the value of higher education for middle-class students and their families."

This is quite an honor for the Salt City. The Presidential spot light carries much more weight to cities that have struggled to survive the economic climate that has prevailed in the post 9/11 era, along with being seriously caught in the swoon of the economic meltdown of 2008.

Its also been rumored that on Thursday Night the entire Presidential Entourage will be staying at  the ultra exclusive and chi-chi Mirbeau Spa in my home town of Skaneateles, which sits on the northern tip of one of the freshest bodies of water in the US.

Skaneateles Lake is part of the water supply for residents of the city of Syracuse, with over 250,000 humans dependent on access to clean and plentiful water.

(A  disclaimer: I've been involved in the anti-hydrofracking grass roots movement in New York State for almost five years now, and administer a facebook page called YOU CAN'T DRINK MONEY.)

Many people on the grass roots level have worked tirelessly to protect Skaneateles Lake, and thus the water supply for a densely populated area, as gas leases were signed willy nilly in the gold rush that is high volume, slick water, hydrofracking. So far, a moratorium on the practice has held for five years, and Skaneateles Lake got a special layer of dispensation that would make it slightly less profitable to frack about and around its shores.

President Obama has been recently quoted as calling the US "The New Saudi Arabia Of Natural Gas", and is about to sign off on opening federally controlled lands to widespread fracking, among other initiatives. He has adopted an open and official stance of "Damn The Torpedoes, Full Speed Ahead". His usual stance of at least perceived caution and pragmatism has been clearly discarded for a "Drill, Baby, Drill" policy that out Sarah Palins Sarah Palin.

He's making James Watt look like a bonafide tree hugger.
 
I'm a supporter of the President, and voted for him twice. I'd be a liar if I didn't mention that lately I've been pretty disappointed with some of his policy decisions and administrative actions, especially those revolving around energy and natural gas extraction in the US.

So the irony of the President on a promotional tour and taking a break to enjoy one of the most naturally beautiful places in New York State that many have busted their collective asses (at great personal and financial risk) to protect from the industrial dangers of high volume, slick water, horizontal hydrofracking hasn't escaped me.

                                                          Mirbeau Spa, Skaneateles NY


The more I think about the Presidential Bus Tour stopping in Syracuse and having an overnight in Skaneateles, the more galled and appalled I become considering his stance on hydrofracking.

He will be speaking at a high school ostensibly to talk about the "opportunity to have achieve a quality education".

Those of us involved in the anti hydrofracking movement are concerned with much more simple opportunities. The opportunity to access of clean water, to not have the risks of the oil and gas industry externalized onto an unknowing and uneducated public, by the unethical re-writing of laws and regulations that were bought and paid for by an industry that has proven over time to be wholly incapable of any type of transparency or self-regulation. This is so much more than a straight up environmental issue.

Aside from the absolute public relations tone deaf gaffe of tossing the majority of your New York populist support under the wheels of your tour bus by having a "spa night" like a Pasha (Axelrod and P-Fluffy: Are you listening?), I'd like to make a suggestion:

Stay in Skaneateles if you must, Mr. President, but stick to your principles and the industry rhetorical bullshit that you have embraced and don't turn on the water taps in your luxury bathroom.

Don't wash your hands, hydrate yourself, have bowel movements, brush your teeth or take a shower during your visit.

And if you must urinate, relieve yourself by the side of Route 20 in full sight of your secret service detail.

Or better yet, if you are insistent on propagating this absolute hypocrisy, just go piss up a rope.

I, as did many other of your constituents, voted for you because you were the smartest guy in the room.

That never gave you Carte Blanche to act like the biggest asshole in the room.

YOU CAN'T DRINK MONEY, MR. PRESIDENT.

Friday On My Mind Leads To Tuesday's Child. A Musing On The Presidential Press Conference on 08/09/2013

 There ain't nothin' more powerful than the odor of mendacity!

                  Burl Ives as Big Daddy Pollitt in Tenesee William's "Cat On A Hot Tin Roof"


I've been going to a little 24/7 "key access" gym to rehab an ankle that I inadvertently destroyed in a freak home improvement accident.

Alone in the building, with the sun streaming through the front plate glass window, I mounted the Lifestyle 9500 Elliptical instrument of torture for my dose of aerobic, cardiovascular ankle crunching.

On the television directly in front of me, members of the White House Press Corps were jockeying for position, in preparing for an upcoming Presidential press conference... on a lazy Friday afternoon... in the middle of summer, right before the Prez will disappear off the grid on his Martha's Vineyard Vacation... announced in such a low key fashion that I wasn't even aware that there was going to be an event of such importance to the American and ultimately World Audience even held.

Lucky me, I got to witness the whole enchilada in its entirety, whilst wincing in very real and physical pain, sweating like a whore in church. I even got closed captioning along with sound, and that's always good for a chuckle when watching live broadcasts.

In his opening statement, he promised to address the current Edward Snowden / NSA / Government Surveillance / Leaking vs Whistleblowing/ Internet Privacy Violation debacle, and that seemed like damned good political Kabuki Theater entertainment for the political junkie that I am on a Friday afternoon. I pedaled faster to get my heart rate up to optimum speed for what was to follow, because it promised to be a doozy.

The Obama Administration's now standard tactic of addressing critical issues or signing controversial legislation on the slowest of news cycle days are getting a little moldy for me. "Slipping it in the backdoor when no one notices" is not a hallmark of grabbing the reigns of leadership robustly. Its bad passive aggressive manners in bed, and even more obviously manipulative and duplicitous in the political arena.

As the President addressed the issue of Snowden/ Leaks/ The Patriot Act/ The NSA / FISC ect, I ticked off on my fingers every provable, debatable half truth, subterfuge and lie. I'm not exactly uninformed on Patriot Act abuse, as its study has been kind a "hobby" of mine for the past 5 years or so.

I was struck with how the President was allowing himself little to no wiggle room, and no outlet to any plausible deniability with the absolute finality and assuredness in some of his statements. I didn't know whether to cheer at the TV at the sheer genius of his bluffing strategy, or yell at the TV to advise him to duck. He wasn't potentially digging holes with a garden shovel, he was breaking out the back hoe and doubling down.

It was as if he, The Big P-Fluffer, and Axelrod were never around when Clinton uttered "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky", and never learned the political and public relations lessons in the aftermath of that fateful statement.

As I watched this press conference the critical question for me was "Does He know the extent of what he is saying, or is He being fed so much dis-information by his advisory teams that he's actually being set up for a massive fall?"

As I entertained that hypothetical second notion, I became very concerned for our President. Perhaps the bubble that he lives in has made him that vulnerable to that type of attack.

The surface is only being scratched here. If the actual abuses of these programs are eventually uncovered (and judging by the draconian clampdown by the administration, somewhat of a perceived long shot at this point; one can only hope that more whistleblowers will surface), then the President has either an unprecedented hubris, or is about to be forced into taking an unwitted fall of epic proportions. One thing is for sure though. To paraphrase "Breaking Bad"'s Walter White; he most definitely is not currently "Treading Lightly".

I won't bore you with the gory details of refuting or debating what was said in this conference, but today an article published by The Atlantic started making the social network rounds on facebook entitled: "THE SURVEILLANCE SPEECH: A NEW LOW IN BARRACK OBAMA'S PRESIDENCY. His tone was inappropriately dismissive, while the substance was misleading at best, and mendacious at worst" (Byline: Connor Friedersdorf, August 12, 2013 at 4:14 am)

I couldn't have agreed with that opening shot across the bow more. So I dove in and read the thing, and if you should decide to go any further with this blog, I suggest you read it and get up to speed. I don't know if the editorial slant of The Atlantic is part of the vast biased media conspiracy, but I do know that the article is worth the time to read and consider.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/08/the-surveillance-speech-a-low-point-in-barack-obamas-presidency/278565/

I seem to confuse my facebook and social networking  friends with my political views. I'm loathe to put an ideological label on myself, because I find the whole idea of an all or nothing bi-polar ideological system loathsome to begin with. Truth and Consensual Realities, are on a potentiometer.

There are many different degrees, and many different points of view and perspectives. All must be accommodated, and none should be marginalized. Like the X-Files, truth is in there somewhere, but it has to come from interpretation, and that can only happen when the data set you're working with is as complete as you can possibly make it. Collect the data, orbit and rotate around it, view all facets, and then make an interpretive call. That is as close to truth in the political arena that you will ever get.

If forced, I guess I'm a left leaning centrist. I believe in progressive thinking, and therefore could be labeled a liberal progressive.  I also believe in basic common sense, and certain core ideas like respecting the Constitution; rather the province of a typical definition of  a "Conservative".

So when I choose to be publicly critical of the stewardship of the Presidency (per example), somehow my liberal friends think I've gone over to the dark side, and my Conservative friends think I'm somehow validating their more extremist positions... both of which couldn't be further from my own truth. There's a lot of unconscious, non-voluntary knee jerking going on out there in cyber space.

Being critical of how the Presidency is represented to the American Public and thus the world does not automatically mean that you don't support " The Presidency" or even The President for that matter. It does mean that you want it to function differently, and in your own opinion, function better and at a higher level. You want your guy to do the job you know he's capable of doing.

People seem to be very comfortable in demonizing President Obama as a singular entity, but lets get real here for a brief NY minute. The Presidency is always a creation of committee; many different skill sets are required to acquire a US Presidency, from the creative conceptualization of an electable entity to those who put up the money to fund the initiative to go out and win it.

The Executive Branch is then beholden, and accountable, to all that contributed to secure the reigns of power for four, or in the current case, an eight year cycle... and the basic job of elected office is to make hay for yourself and your supporters while the sun shines. In cases where there are no term limits, the figureheads are constantly raising money first, leading and legislating LAST. Its all about power, and money, in that order.

But every once in awhile to make it look good, the manifestation of progress on a social initiative might materialize...but more times than not "legislation and appropriations" take the form some sort of legal chicanery that results in someone making a lot of money, either the elected official his or herself, or the consortia and corporations that put up the money to get them there in the first place.

The hoi polloi electorate that physically won the office, in the end in terms of hierarchy in the food chain of being accountable for, is far down the actual agenda ladder.

Cynical, I know. But that's our current system, in simplified terms.

This particular Presidency is a brain child of a few brilliant American public relation minds, the best and brightest on the technological front, and deep, deep pockets; not only a group that obviously includes President Obama himself, but also the individuals that really invented the concept of an "Obama Presidency." They are leading just as much as the figurehead himself, if not more so.

I know its hard, but try to not buy into the singular entity as a target, but the larger organization of what the figurehead represents... and here's a clue. It isn't the Democratic Party. Widen your scope and your ability to its widest angle, and you still will be hard pressed to identify (Its designed that way).

What I saw in this press conference was a man that may have finally reached a "Peter Principle" point. He finally was over matched and over whelmed in actual performance and conceptual ability to perform the required task at hand. Either that, or a Narcissist that has finally strayed far off the reservation.

What was exhibited in my mind was the clear incapability to step outside his committee consensus and take the lead for those who supported this Presidency from the bottom; The ones that worked phone banks, and contributed their paltry five dollars in unprecedented numbers during the campaign of 2008. We're all waiting for the potential that was recognized to be finally realized.

What seems to be happening is the exact opposite; The Atlantic article clearly articulates in point by point fashion not only the minute points concerning surveillance, but in doing so, exposes the larger methodology of the official actions and strategies of the current Presidency.

A standard reaction tool now used is the one of "withering condescension" directed at the opposition forces.

It may have worked in the past, but this too is becoming less an less of an effective strategy. It works less and less on the informed. Whether a rabid frothing at the mouth tea bagger or a way left of center commie pinko liberal, the internal thought that is inspired by that now standard five year rhetorical maneuver and smug high school debate strategy is basically, "Fuck Off, Mr. President".

No American Citizen, no matter at what station of life they may or may not occupy, needs to willingly suffer an arrogant asshole, especially one that's digging himself in a hole in front of their very eyes. Take your constituents a little more seriously, and treat them with the respect you demand for yourself. You'll need the hands of those same constituents to pull you out of this current mess of your own making down the road.

There is a simple pathway out of the current NSA/ Security / Privacy / Snowden morass. There may be legal implications that dictate massaging it with a seemingly light non-committal touch, but in the end, there are going to have to be some heads on pikes. Significant ones, but not so much to touch the Presidency. In other words, by targeting Snowden, you are targeting the wrong head. Or set of heads, for that matter.

It may be a good obfuscation trick to focus the debate on the ""Is He A Traitor? / Is He A Hero?" question, but that will only work in the short term. Many of us are actually beyond that and focused on the content of the message that Snowden actually attempted to deliver. Dropping the turd in the cornflake bowl on a Friday before the slowest news cycle of the year isn't going to throw people of the scent. Its a woeful underestimation of the resolve of the American Citizenry.

There will be damage and loss, much like a drastic cancer surgery. Cancer can be survived after radical surgery, and so can a Presidency and its subsequent legacy after a large scale public purging and house cleaning.

Then all the actors will get to do there best Claude Rains in Casablanca impression "I'm SHOCKED... SHOCKED that this was going on in this Casino!". The Kabuki Theater will compel the public to stop paying attention to the next bit of behind the scenes thievery, and eventually we all can get back to "normal" and business as usual.

But if the decision is made to continue down the current pathway that seems to have been chosen by the creators and handlers of this Presidency, a word of caution. You have compromised the figurehead to the point that if the real truth of these matters are uncovered, then that figurehead will be burned beyond any reasonable political or public repair. Its a very dangerous political and public relations game that is being played right now.

I like a high stakes gamble as much as anybody, but don't overestimate your ability to keep a lid on this one, or plug all the leaks. Too many people know too much. Its the HUBRIS that will kill your golden goose.

So give up a little ground first. It will give you the element of surprise.You missed the window to get ahead on this issue, and now you're about to enter full on damage/ spin control. The water is swirling down the bowl, and unfortunately its YOUR HAND that jiggled the lever... a rookie mistake, really , and that's why I'm disappointed.

So follow the simple dictum and the standard playbook. Its standard for a reason; now is not the time to re-invent the wheel.. Shed some sacrificial heads that are verifiable abusers of the laws on the books ( I have a few suggestions if you're interested), and live to fight another day. You have an election cycle coming up in 2014, a political and data collecting machine to preserve post term, people to pay off, and a legacy to secure.... oh yeah, and a country that needs to run that actually requires guidance and leadership, instead of falsely sustaining the seat of power on a fuel mixture that CAN be clearly recognized as a formula comprised of mostly horseshit by all Americans if they invest the energy to take a heady whiff, regardless of their ideological leanings.

Have a nice vacation, and then get your collective heads out of the sand of your own creation.


And as a minor personal aside to P-Fluffer and Axelrod: Bo The DOG being delivered by Ofsprey to Martha's Vineyard? Who made THAT genius call?

You guys are killing us. Dip in the well of Archie Drell and the Bells and "Tighten Up".

Building Mountains Out Of Mosque Hills

The ingenious design of the constitution is that not only is the concept of majority rule defined, but at the same time, minority protections are written into the document as well.

History is littered with very real examples of the "majority" collective mindset not always being a shining beacon of the correct path. Nazi Germany? The Civil Rights Movement activity centered around the South?

This country was settled by the Pilgrims (among others), a minority escaping the religious persecution of the crown.

The list can be voluminous.

Would a Christianity based church built within a three city block radius of George Tiller's former medical practice cause such a public hub-bub? A YMCA within the vicinity of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building site in Oklahoma City? Probably not. People choosing to follow the tenets of Christianity do not scare or intimidate me, even if sometimes it spawns dangerous radicalism on it's fringes.

Extremism is Extremism, no matter what faith it attaches itself to.

There is a difference between the Islamic faith and Islamic extremism. In the aftermath of 9/11, President George W. Bush was very careful in responsibly drawing that distinction in a crisis, a distinction that is now disintegrating behind the purposeful crafted agendas of right wing think tanks, and it's media organs. It's a cheap political ploy, but by demonizing a populace for political gain, it starts to smell like a page out of the National Socialist playbook; state sanctioned bigotry, anger, and its eventual violent outcome being its cornerstone. It is civic irresponsibility beyond the pale.

This is the REAL dangerous issue, not the construction of an Islamic community center .

As long as you aren't a conspiracy theorist and think that the Illuminati took down the twin towers to gin up a phony war to control the world's oil reserves and accept the premise that members of Al Qaeda did the deed, then an Islamic Community Center really isn't that big of a deal.... unless of course, it is engineered to appear as such.

This is a faux controversy, created to obsfucate the electorate from what is truly important in this year's election cycle, with the sheep-like acceptance of the media in promoting this quantum cartload of horse manure...on both sides of the ideological spectrum, and not just the obvious projectile bile that spews forth nightly from FOX NEWS and NEWS CORP's Murdochian maw. Because these shenanigans have to be exposed, it sucks everybody into the black hole to the detriment of all.

August is always a slow month. Last year it was "Death Panels".

The sad part is that the general populace buys this crap, year in and year out. All of these jerks are absolutely dependent on a dumbed down population, and unfortunately it is a strategy that seems to be working.

The risks and liabilities of demonizing and persecuting a peaceful Muslim faithful for the gain of a vote and political leverage will ultimately be externalized upon a populace that doesn't even realize, even in a post 9/11 world, how those risks and liabilities could manifest themselves in a future reality.

Does anyone think that widespread religious persecution of followers of a specific faith is EVER going to end well, here at home or abroad?

The whole of human history suggests otherwise. These are dark days indeed.

Mountains Out Of Mosque Hills, Part 2

I honestly don't think the beliefs of over a billion people should be indicted by it's fringe elements.



I also believe, as I personal lifestyle choice, that I will not be ruled by fear. And no matter what the polling numbers are, the numbers are skewed by fear, not a rational thought process.... it's bill of goods designed to illicit a knee jerk reaction.



These are my opinions, of course.... but history has shown, that by demonizing a system of belief, a race of people, or the denizens of the lowest strata of an economic subset, IT ALWAYS TURNS OUT BAD!



The building of Minarets has been banned in Switzerland. A Burqua Ban, passed in the assembly, and sponsored by President Sarkozy, is projected to make it's way through French parliament.



I ask all of you: How do you think this is all going to end up? Put on your predictioneering cap, and come up with the best educated guess as you can.



World wide promotion of xenophobia is a losers game, in the end. America, and it's ideals, should be a beacon of enlightenment... and I feel this whole mess is just a small indicator of what is to come, if we allow that xenophobia to wash over us.



It will snuff out that guiding light, and that, in the end, is the concept, ideals and consensual philosophy contained in The Constitution that must be protected and preserved at all costs.



The "enemy" are not the followers of Islam. The enemy is a part of us. This issue is just another societal self inflicted gunshot wound, propagated by people who aren't really interested in protecting those ideals.... and in part, yes perhaps even the majority of our society is allowing the trigger to be pulled. That doesn't necessarilly indicate its the proper action.



There will be no televised galvanizing moment ala Joseph Nye Welch baldly asking Joseph McCarthy, "....Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?"



Things are way too fragmented. There are 1000's of channels, instead of 2 or 3 as there were in 1954. The attention of the American populace will never again have a riveting moment of communal introspection such as that.



There will be no "shot across the bow" that will cause us to awaken from our collective dream state.



Divide and conquer is the strategy and order of the day. Rule by fear. Keep everyone scared, misinformed, and confused. If truth is inconvenient to agenda, then by all means necessary, lie.



By all means, let's further open the floodgates of corporate lobbying dollars to further corrupt an already compromised Governmental system, and then force Government to work by 21st century corporation policy, where at any cost, all risk and liability of action will be assumed by an unknowing, uninformed, and unvoiced general population: All the while framing the argument that somehow, this agenda is sound policy, and then sell it to the unsuspecting.



The point of this exercise was to perhaps reveal that this is just an indicator: a tip of a very large iceberg that is breaking the water line.... and we can't figure out that we are all on the same Ocean Liner slowly headed straight for it.



Instead of grabbing the wheel, we seem more concerned with figuring out what tune the band is playing and artfully re-arranging the deck chairs.

Our National Barrel Roll

The “Restoring Honor” gathering on the Washington Mall, headlined by Glenn Beck with Former Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin in a supporting role, was a significant event. Whether interpreted as a spiritual “Come To Jesus” revival meeting, a political pep-rally-on-steroids, or a sincere expression of the legitimate frustration and anger of the electorate depends on personal perspective and personal opinion.

But to summarily dismiss it would be a mistake, given the context of the times in which we live. All factors, including the date chosen for the rally, and it’s various media and think tank sponsors need to be considered, as well as the curiously well-timed media and thus very public brouhaha over the building of the Park 51 Islamic community center that blossomed and overwhelmed the previous news cycles immediately preceding Mr. Beck’s attempt at restoring honor, “reclaiming the civil rights movement”, and more importantly convincing the faithful that “America today gets to turn back to God”; Or at least the version of God that the folks behind this show want you to swallow.

This is a News Corp / Freedom Works / Americans For Prosperity sponsored event, it has been developed around the incendiary bile that has spewed forth from Beck's and other Fox talking head's maws since the start of this News Corporation "programming" campaign, resulting in what may become just one of many gatherings that have absolutely and purposefully been cut from the same conceptual and public relations cloth of those memorable little get-togethers at Nuremburg. It is bald and it is obvious whose playbook is being consulted, and what pages are being torn from it for closer review.

But that doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. That agenda has worked swimmingly, and this is the coming out party and the official parting of the curtain, revealing a debutante ball on the Washington Mall. It's here, it's real, and everybody should start paying very close attention. It’s showtime!

So while God, The "Founding Father's Original Intent", and Constitutional concerns were being invoked by Mr. Beck and Ms. Palin on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, it might be helpful to actually expose ourselves to what one of our founding fathers actually thought:

Josiah Franklin, publisher of the weekly NEW ENGLAND COURANT (the first independent newspaper of the colonies), Benjamin's older brother, was jailed for three weeks without trial in the summer of 1722 by Massachusetts authorities for the crime of the "high affront" of questioning their policing efforts centered about the issue of piracy.

A young Benjamin took over the publishing duties of the paper for those three weeks.

Writing under the pseudonym of "Silence Doogood", here are a few choice thoughts from a young Franklin that might be germane to the discussion.

On free speech:

"Without freedom of thought there can be no such thing as wisdom and no such thing as public liberty without freedom of speech"

Seem like that statement lines up pretty well, no matter what point on the ideological dial you may be happening to choose to occupy. But then Ben floats this question within that three-week period:

"Whether a Commonwealth suffers by hypocritical pretenders to religion or by the openly profane?" and arrived at this observation:

"... Some late thoughts of this nature have inclined me to think that the hypocrite is the most dangerous person of the two, especially if he sustains a post in Government.... The most dangerous hypocrite in a Commonwealth is one that leaves the gospel for the sake of the law. A man compounded of law and gospel is able to cheat a whole country with his religion and then destroy them under the color of law".

Ben Franklin was 16 years old when he wrote this. Out of the mouths of babes, indeed.

So: Rather than a polarized discourse on the surface topics such as Constitutionalism and the real driving forces between the concept of "Separation of Church and State", etc., perhaps we can all agree on a basic premise:

That somehow, we are all possibly seeing the same outcome, but through different prisms of perception.

The new paradigm in corporate strategy is in re-assigning (or "externalizing") the risks and liabilities of their corporate agendas on an unsuspecting, unaware, unvoiced, and unrepresented populace. Nobody gives a tumbling rat's arse about your political and/or religious beliefs, as long as the risk is assumed outside of the corporate structure.

This is what the banking meltdown of 2008 was all about, and this is why billions of dollars are spent lobbying your elected (your "representational") officials.

This is why the Citizen's United case was decided 5-4 by the Supreme Court to further open the floodgates of corporate money into our political discourse and process.

Lobbyists had a banner year in 2009, with over 3.5 billion dollars shelled out (this equates to over 1.3 million dollars PER HOUR that Congress was in session).

Who’s at fault? It may be easy to target those promoting a "pro-business agenda", because frankly, they’re more nakedly bald about their actions. It's easier to target folks like Rupert Murdoch, the Koch Brothers, or Dick Armey because of their graceless transparency and unbridled aggression, but in reality, everyone that is in position to stick their hand in that particular river of money shares a certain amount of guilt and responsibility. The veneer of competition is only there to see who controls it.

In other words, this isn't a "left/right" argument, or at least it doesn't need to be: The polarization of the American populace only happens when individuals allow themselves to be polarized. Everybody, no matter what their political inclinations may be, can recognize that in the end, representational government is quickly becoming a farce, if it isn't one already.

So whether it's Rush Limbaugh spewing invective, Glenn Beck weeping while pontificating, Keith Olbermann bloviating, Rachel Maddow snarkily delivering a sniggering aside, or Andrew Breitbart doctoring video and then Fox News promoting it in an never ending loop... media matters. It's how we collect data to make informed decisions. And our data is corrupted, because our broken system absolutely requires that to function in the way that they see fit.

Instead of getting sucked in to the "issues" rabbit hole, maybe we should all just stop, and ponder thoughtfully at its rim for a moment. Maybe there is a different national strategy that doesn't involve jumping in it in a reactive, emotionally driven way... maybe we should all ask ourselves the question "Why am I being encouraged to jump in, by whom, and to what end?"

Why must we all shove ourselves into a barrel and then thrown off the side of Niagara Falls, given the directive of "fight it out amongst yourselves"?

This I know: The journey as the barrel rolls will not be a pleasant one. Elbows will be thrown under a pervasive environment of unadulterated fear as the political "plunge-o-sphere" rotates in free fall. Rascist hate generated centrifugal force will glue your back firmly against the curved inner wall. And for those who survive the experience of the barrel being dashed upon the rocks and you lay broken and bloodied for having taken the trouble for the trip, there will be someone at the bottom to gather you in their loving arms...and then punch you in the face, just in case you didn't quite understand.

That's a diversionary tactic. Sleight of hand via misdirection techniques. Let the masses squabble and re-direct attention, while the game is run.

I see this as a game, and one rigged for everyone to lose except for the very few that are in position to take advantage.

The only move on the chessboard that makes any sense to me, is maybe considering not getting in the barrel in the first place. The game cannot be run effectively without enough people jumping in.

So either we continue to let them play, or we devise an alternative strategy that will allow us to truly restore the concept of "We the People", instead of allowing a den of thieves, regardless of ideology, to wrap themselves in the constitution and flag, with the sole intent of forcing the American public to hold the bag for their actions.

The "Fourth Estate" used to be the press. It isn't anymore. The Fourth Column of our Government is now the flow of corporate cash, and that will only continue to slowly and painfully castrate and corrupt our sacred founding documents, and the ideals and philosophies that ALL Americans hold dear.

The Constitution and the Bill of Rights are compacts, and inviolable contracts within the context of a Republic. "These truths we hold to be self evident..."

Let's truly seek out truth and justice. Let us allow America to find her way. That journey starts with an individual decision, and that is the true genius behind those compacts.